This model is basically a top-down approach and it uses authority to create and coordinate a horizontal and vertical division of labour - Response to Hurricane Katrina Essay introduction. Under this model, knowledge is treated as a scarce resource and the advantage of this model is that it provides a forum for employing a large number of people and preserves ambiguous accountability for the work that is carried out. In this model the command shared by the higher authority compels others to respond accordingly. Since there is a chain of command, it is the necessary that the person in command to have good leadership skills.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. From the same document, we can picture the following: Infrastructures like the New Orleans levee, buildings and offices may be rebuilt in the long run.
But homes and both shattered and lost lives will be forever gone. Unfortunately, these cannot be approximated and no dollar value will ever suffice to measure the human toll.
Historically, the federal disaster responses to natural and man made calamities adhere to the principle of utilizing state and local resources first and federal aid comes as a supplement. However, a lot has changed since. Before, the context by which this premise and ensuing principles of allowing states work independently has worked.
But over the last sixty 60 years, the Response to hurricane katrina essay for a more comprehensive, organized and sustained effort and response in resolving issues and calamities have manifested itself.
Since the Civil Defense Act of which was the first comprehensive legislation pertaining to Federal disaster reliefthe world has changed considerably. Acts of terrorism became widespread and global in scope.
There is also the persistent threat of extreme weather changes because of global warming — the latest of which was Hurricane Katrina. And then who could forget September 11, ? All these called for a more potent federal disaster response. Before September 11, Federal response from various agencies was piecemeal and uncoordinated.
The event triggered several fundamental changes in the Federal response to disaster management. It was an event that proved to be a catalyst for a more effective coordination among federal, state and local government agencies. Because of this, President Bush called for a major initiative to unify all efforts towards disaster management and create a nationwide response system.
As a direct result, the Department of Homeland Security was formed that welded all the operational controls of 22 departments, agencies and offices. While the NIMS established post incident management protocols and procedures for emergency personnel from all levels of Federal authorities down to the rank and file, the NRP forms the basic framework for the local counterpart of NIMS.
From the segmented and piecemeal approach of government intervention during nationwide disasters, the HSPD-5 gave birth to NIMS and the NRP as a blueprint for a more integrated and coordinated response in anticipation to a post event. These parameters are as follows — to quote : A Federal department or agency acting under its own authority has requested the assistance of the Secretary; The resources of State and local authorities are overwhelmed and Federal assistance has been requested by the appropriate State and local authorities; More than one Federal department or agency has become substantially involved in responding to the incident; or The Secretary has been directed to assume responsibility for managing the domestic incident by the President; There are overlapping features and conditionality not to mention that each can also be interpreted differently.
It has been recommended that this conditionality be further elucidated and defined so as not to cause confusion, and in the long run — inaction or delays in the response time to the disastrous event or emergency for which it was intended to facilitate. As it is, INS can be subject to varied and confused interpretation and the levels of authority or bureaucracy seems to all stem from two major actors only — the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and the President.Humanitarian Response to New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina.
Research Papers on the Humanitarian Response to New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina. An excellent public administration project is to look at the humanitarian response as it relates to New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina. Aug 29, · Hurricane Katrina Essay.
Government Interaction after Hurricane Katrina. Words | 7 Pages.
PUBLIC POLICY RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA Summary As the Gulf States begin the massive task of reconstruction after Hurricane Katrina, the nation is actively engaged in a dialogue concerning the lessons learned . Essay on Hurricane Sandy and Hurricane Katrina.
According to the “The handy weather answer book” by Kevin Hile a hurricane is defined as a tropical storm formed in the Atlantic Basin. The response allows sharing of costs by the organizations involved thus reducing the cost borne by each state in mounting response to Hurricane Katrina (Walsh, Christen Jr, Lord, & Miller, ).
Emergency management at the local level and implementation of the NRF in response to Katrina. The Government’s Response to Hurricane Katrina In this analysis, the role of the government and it’s response to Hurricane Katrina will be examined.
This is a . PUBLIC POLICY RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA Summary As the Gulf States begin the massive task of reconstruction after Hurricane Katrina, the nation is actively engaged in a dialogue concerning the lessons learned from this catastrophe, and the best options moving forward.