Symbolic interactionism and geertz deep play

This section needs additional citations for verification.

Symbolic interactionism and geertz deep play

By Justin Lancon 3. This continued until the day of a raid on an illegal cockfight that they were attending.

Symbolic interactionism and geertz deep play

They ran and hid with a Balinese man and his wife, and when the police came to investigate, the man covered for them. After this incident, Geertz was widely accepted into the community, but beyond that, he had been made aware of the central importance of the cockfight itself.

In Bali, the cocks are only fighting symbolically--they are stand-ins for their trainers. The cocks are seen as extensions of the bodies of the men who own them. Balinese moral language is full of rooster images. Men are deeply attached to their cocks, taking great care of them, feeding them special food, spending time with them, grooming them and so on.

The birds are also seen as the embodiment of what the Balinese see as the opposite of humanity--animality. The Balinese revile animalistic behavior, and so by identifying with a cock, the Balinese man is also identifying with what he most hates and fears.

In this way, cockfighting is a blood sacrifice to these demons of animality, and they precede temple festivals and holidays in an attempt to keep the demons at bay.

Clifford Geertz - Wikipedia

As you might expect of a practice that is so important to a people, the cockfight is highly controlled and tightly planned. Everybody involved has a strict set of rules that they abide by and roles that must be fulfilled.

So the cockfight is at once a raging ball of animal chaos and a deeply regulated sociological entity. This defines the cockfight in the larger sense for Geertz. Betting is central to the cockfight and just as deeply regulated as the rest of it.

There are primary bets between competitors and side bets between spectators.

Anthro Classes and Essays on Culture, Food Research and Disaster Field Reports

The primary bets are always even money, while the odds for side bets will change based on the amount of the primary bet. As the primary bet rises--the reasoning goes--the more likely it is that the match is in fact an even one, so the side bets go towards the short end of the spectrum.

The cost is not only monetary, however. Money in these bets is seen as a sort of stand-in for moral importance--status or prestige.

Losing a cockfight is much like receiving a particularly nasty insult and losing a chunk of money as well. The stakes involved increase the meaningfulness of the fights, since everyone involved both directly and indirectly likely has some stake in the success of failure of a particular bird.In his essay, “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” Clifford Geertz described what appears to be playing sports or even gambling – cockfighting.

But reading further, one can understand that one important point of the article addresses human passions, self-expression, and relationship.

Ethnography (from Greek ἔθνος ethnos "folk, people, nation" and γράφω grapho "I write") is the systematic study of people and cultures. It is designed to explore cultural phenomena where the researcher observes society from the point of view of the subject of the study.

An ethnography is a means to represent graphically and in writing the . The key analytical aspect missing from Geertz’s “Deep Play” essay itself is the broader socio-cultural and political-economic context of religious cere- Interpretive tradition in social science, especially Symbolic Interactionism (Blumer, ; Stone, ) and Neo-Weberian comparative historical.

Clifford Geertz's seminal work "Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight" debates this idea as Geertz describes betting on cockfights which rationally make no sense in terms of economics but which makes perfect sense to the locals because of the status and other values assigned to the activity.

Précis for "Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight" (Geertz ) By Justin Lancon | Writing for Cultural Anthropology October When Clifford Geertz and his wife first arrived in Bali, they were largely ignored by the villagers.

Symbolic interactionism and geertz deep play

Symbolic Interactionism and Geertz' Deep Play Symbolic Interactionism and Geertz’ Deep Play Symbolic interaction, one of the three main perspectives of the social sciences of Anthropology and Sociology, was thought to be first conceived by Max Weber and George Herbert Mead as they both emphasized the subjective meaning of .

"Improvising on Sensitizing Concepts" - Robert R. Faulkner